Development of rapid, simple and novel method for the validation of Abaloparatide and Teriparatide in Combined Dosage Form By RP-HPLC Method
Ganesh Akula1*, D. Vani2, M. Venkata Ramana3, Salla Pujitha4, Yerolla Soundarya5
1Associate Professor, Department of Chemistry,
Surabhi Dayakar Rao College of Pharmacy, JNTUH, Telangana, India.
2Student, Department of Pharmaceutical analysis,
Surabhi Dayakar Rao College of Pharmacy, JNTUH, Telangana, India.
3Principal, Department of Chemistry, Surabhi Dayakar Rao College of Pharmacy, JNTUH, Telangana, India.
4Assistant professor, Department of Pharmacology,
Surabhi Dayakar Rao College of Pharmacy, JNTUH, Telangana, India.
5Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis,
Surabhi Dayakar Rao College of Pharmacy, JNTUH, Telangana, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: akulaganesh@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Different analytical methods have been reported for the estimation and validation of abaloparatide and teriparatide.1 According to WHO guidelines, validation is defined as a documented act that demonstrates or verifies that any part, substance, method, machine, system, or activity and it confirming that all GMPs have been adhered to successfully throughout the manufacturing process and that the anticipated outcomes will materialise.2 RP-HPLC method having simple composition of mobile phase. Hence an attempt has been made to develop and validate a novel, simple and sensitive cost-effective rapid RP-HPLC method in validated according to international conference on harmonization (ICH) guidelines guidelines.3,4,5 The principle behind RP-HPLC is hydrophobic interaction.6 The method for the estimation of abaloparatide and teriparatide in their combined dosage form and to validate the method with respect to specificity, accuracy, precision, linearity and range.7,8,9,10
Abaloparatide is an analog of PTHrP (parathyroid hormone-related protein) with the molecular formula C174H300N56O49 and Molecular weight:3961.0 Da11. It was approved in April 28, 2017 by the FDA (as Tymlos) for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture12. It have potential to widen the anabolic window for bone therapeutics, stimulating bone formation with a limited effect on bone resorption and mineral mobilization. acts as an agonist on PTH type 1 receptor (PTH1R) and activates both G protein–mediated cAMP signaling and β-arrestin-mediated ERK-1/2 signaling also binds to binds to RG conformation of PTH1R that results in more transient cell signalling responses.13
Teriparatide (recombinant human parathyroid hormone/PTH) with Molecular Formula: C181H291N55O51S2 Molecular weight:4117.715 Da with a potent anabolic agent14 used in the treatment of osteoporosis. Endogenous PTH is the primary regulator of calcium and phosphate metabolism in bone and kidney and stimulates new bone formation leading to increased bone mineral density that helps to decrease the risk of getting a fracture.15
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Optimized Chromatographic Conditions:
|
Instrument used: |
Waters HPLC with auto sampler and PDA Detector 996 model. |
|
Temperature: |
35ºC |
|
Column: |
Phenomenex Luna C18 (4.6×250mm, 5µm) particle size |
|
Buffer: |
Potassium dihydrogen Phosphate |
|
pH: |
4.6 |
|
Mobile phase: |
Acetonitrile: Phosphate Buffer (45:55 v/v) |
|
Flow rate: |
1ml/min |
|
Wavelength: |
245 nm |
|
Injection volume: |
10 ml |
|
Run time: |
7 min |
Preparation of Potassium dihydrogen Phosphate (KH2PO4) buffer (pH-4.6):
Dissolved 6.8043 of potassium dihydrogen phosphate in 1000ml HPLC water and adjusted the pH 4.6 with diluted orthophosphoric acid. Filtered and sonicated the solution by vacuum filtration and ultrasonication.
Preparation of Mobile Phase:
Accurately measured 450ml (45%) of Methanol, 550ml of Phosphate buffer (55%) were mixed and degassed in digital ultra sonicater for 15 minutes and then filtered through 0.45µ filter under vacuum filtration.
The Mobile phase was used as the diluent.
Preparation of Standard Solutions of Abaloparatide and Teriparatide:
Accurately weighed and transferred 10mg of Abaloparatide and 10mg of Teriparatide working standard into a 10ml of clean dry volumetric flasks added 7mL of Diluents and sonicated to dissolve it completely and made volume up to the mark with the same solvent. (Stock solution) Further pipette 0.1ml of the above Abaloparatide and 0.3ml of the Teriparatide stock solutions into a 10ml volumetric flask and dilute up to the mark with Diluent.
VALIDATION PARAMETERS:
Drug Specificity:
Preparation of Sample Solution:
An average weight of Tablet and crushed in a mortor by using pestle and weight 10mg weight of Abaloparatide and Teriparatide sample into a 10mL clean dry volumetric flask and added 7mL of Diluent and sonicated to dissolve it completely and made volume up to the mark with the same solvent. Further pipette 0.1ml of the above Abaloparatide and 0.3ml of the Teriparatide stock solutions into a 10ml volumetric flask and diluted up to the mark with Diluent.
Preparation of drug solution for Linearity (Level I-V):
Pipette out 0.06ml and 0.18ml,0.08ml and 0.24ml, 0.1 ml and 0.3ml, 0.12 ml and 0.36ml, 0.14ml and 0.42ml of stock solutions to prepare 6 ppm and 18ppm, 8ppmand 24ppm, 10ppm and 30ppm, 12ppm and 36ppm, 14ppm and 42ppm of Abaloparatide and Teriparatide solutions respectively.
Injected each level into the chromatographic system and measured the peak area.
Precision:
Repeatability:
The standard solutions were injected for five times measured the area and %RSD for the area of five replicate injections was calculated.
Intermediate Precision:
Intermediate precision /Ruggedness was performed for 2 days by injecting 6 replicated injections by maintaining same conditions.
Accuracy:
Preparation of 50%, 100% and 150% Standard Stock Solutions:
Pipette 0.05ml and 0.15ml, 0.1ml and 0.3ml, 0.15ml and 0.45ml of Abaloparatide and Teriparatide stock solutions respectively into a 10ml volumetric flask and diluted up to the mark with Diluent. Inject the Three replicate injections of individual concentrations. Recorded the chromatograms and measured the peak responses.
Robustness:
The sample was analyzed by variation in flow conditions and mobile phase. Flow conditions at 0.9 ml/min and 1.1ml/min instead of 1ml/min and Acetonitrile: Phosphate Buffer was taken in the ratio and 50:50, 40:60 instead (45:55), remaining conditions are same. 10µl of the above sample was injected and chromatograms were recorded.
3. RESULTS
Figure 1: Chromatogram showing blank (mobile phase preparation)
Table 1: Results of system suitability
|
S. No |
Name |
Rt |
Area |
Height |
USP plate count |
USP Tailing |
USP Resolution |
|
|
1 |
Abaloparatide |
2.117 |
765843 |
69587 |
5589 |
1.9 |
- |
Mean 765855.6 |
|
2 |
Abaloparatide |
2.118 |
766594 |
69854 |
5576 |
1.6 |
- |
|
|
3 |
Abaloparatide |
2.116 |
765487 |
70211 |
5658 |
1.6 |
- |
Std. Dev 466.6522 |
|
4 |
Abaloparatide |
2.109 |
765928 |
69213 |
5642 |
1.7 |
- |
|
|
5 |
Abaloparatide |
2.102 |
765426 |
69558 |
5685 |
1.6 |
- |
% RSD 0.060932 |
|
6 |
Teriparatide |
3.547 |
2534658 |
190058 |
5365 |
1.2 |
2.07 |
Mean 2535034 |
|
7 |
Teriparatide |
3.539 |
2536854 |
190052 |
5348 |
1.4 |
2.05 |
|
|
8 |
Teriparatide |
3.547 |
2535879 |
190078 |
5389 |
1.5 |
2.0 |
Std. Dev 1183.309 |
|
9 |
Teriparatide |
3.565 |
2533564 |
190035 |
5347 |
1.6 |
2.01 |
|
|
10 |
Teriparatide |
3.537 |
2534214 |
190085 |
5364 |
1.6 |
2.01 |
% RSD0.046678 |
Table-:2 Peak results for assay standard
|
S. No |
Name |
Rt |
Area |
Height |
USP Resolution |
USP Tailing |
USP plate count |
Injection |
|
1 |
Abaloparatide |
2.102 |
759868 |
71255 |
|
1.7 |
5689 |
1 |
|
2 |
Teriparatide |
3.537 |
2458754 |
215654 |
2.04 |
1.6 |
5362 |
1 |
|
3 |
Abaloparatide |
2.105 |
759458 |
72541 |
|
1.7 |
5748 |
2 |
|
4 |
Teriparatide |
3.552 |
2465885 |
226565 |
2.00 |
1.6 |
5452 |
2 |
|
5 |
Abaloparatide |
2.112 |
759245 |
72584 |
|
1.7 |
5584 |
3 |
|
6 |
Teriparatide |
3.560 |
2489578 |
221542 |
2.04 |
1.6 |
5456 |
3 |
Table 3: Peak results for Assay sample
|
S.No |
Name |
Rt |
Area |
Height |
USP Resolution |
USP Tailing |
USP plate count |
Injection |
|
1 |
Abaloparatide |
2.120 |
756985 |
68958 |
|
0.98 |
7253 |
1 |
|
2 |
Teriparatide |
3.536 |
2569856 |
198564 |
2.06 |
1.23 |
8836 |
1 |
|
3 |
Abaloparatide |
2.120 |
758745 |
69857 |
|
1.05 |
6530 |
2 |
|
4 |
Teriparatide |
3.537 |
2598654 |
195682 |
2.04 |
0.99 |
7270 |
2 |
|
5 |
Abaloparatide |
2.102 |
756848 |
69588 |
|
1.7 |
7586 |
3 |
|
6 |
Teriparatide |
3.537 |
2587454 |
192541 |
2.04 |
1.6 |
8371 |
3 |
Table 4: Linearity Chromatographic Data
|
Drug |
Concentration mg/ml |
Average Peak Area |
Drug |
Concentration mg/ml |
Average Peak Area |
|
|
6 |
467849 |
Teriparatide
|
18 |
1789546 |
|
8 |
619854 |
24 |
2456987 |
||
|
10 |
768784 |
30 |
3085985 |
||
|
12 |
928977 |
36 |
3759864 |
||
|
14 |
1095698 |
42 |
4406589 |
||
|
18 |
1789546 |
Figure 2: Calibration Graph for Abaloparatide
Figure 3: Calibration Graph for Teriparatide
Linearity Plot:
The plot of Concentration (x) versus the Average Peak Area (y) data of Teriparatide is a straight line.
Slope (m) = 10515 Intercept (c) = 45591 Correlation Coefficient (r) = 0.999
Precision:
Table 5: Results of method precision
|
S. No |
Name |
Injections |
Rt |
Area |
Height |
USP plate count |
USP Tailing |
|
|
1 |
Abaloparatide |
Inj-1 |
2.108 |
766854 |
702564 |
5685 |
1.6 |
Mean 766682 |
|
2 |
Inj-2 |
2.105 |
765884 |
698789 |
5584 |
1.4 |
||
|
3 |
Inj-3 |
2.113 |
765842 |
701235 |
5521 |
1.6 |
Std. Dev 1357.973 |
|
|
4 |
Inj-4 |
2.109 |
768985 |
700124 |
5525 |
1.9 |
||
|
5 |
Inj-5 |
2.109 |
765845 |
698986 |
5578 |
1.7 |
% RSD 0.177123 |
|
|
6 |
Teriparatide |
Inj-1 |
3.552 |
2569865 |
2231111 |
5365 |
1.6 |
Mean 2570013 |
|
7 |
Inj-2 |
3.550 |
2578474 |
2674210 |
5425 |
1.6 |
||
|
8 |
Inj-3 |
3.564 |
2568985 |
2231261 |
5368 |
1.5 |
Std. Dev 15309.45 |
|
|
9 |
Inj-4 |
3.564 |
2586845 |
2421301 |
5359 |
1.5 |
||
|
10 |
Inj-5 |
3.565 |
2545898 |
2324710 |
5498 |
1.6 |
% RSD 0.595695 |
Table 6: Results of Intermediate precision on Day 1 and Day 2 for Abaloparatide
|
S. No. |
Day |
Name |
Rt |
Area |
Height |
USP plate count |
USP Tailing |
|
|
1 |
Day-1 |
Abaloparatide Inj-1 |
2.108 |
758955 |
68986 |
5785 |
1.6 |
Mean 758590.3 |
|
2 |
Abaloparatide Inj-2 |
2.105 |
759869 |
68957 |
5698 |
1.4 |
||
|
3 |
Abaloparatide Inj-3 |
2.113 |
758985 |
68545 |
5689 |
1.6 |
Std. Dev 1339.793 |
|
|
4 |
Abaloparatide Inj-4 |
2.109 |
756894 |
68952 |
5781 |
1.9 |
||
|
5 |
Abaloparatide Inj-5 |
2.109 |
759854 |
68595 |
5785 |
1.7 |
% RSD 0.176616 |
|
|
6 |
Abaloparatide Inj-6 |
2.102 |
756985 |
68952 |
5693 |
1.6 |
||
|
7 |
Day-2 |
Abaloparatide Inj-1 |
2.102 |
766895 |
69858 |
5586 |
1.5 |
Mean 766128.5 |
|
8 |
Abaloparatide Inj-2 |
2.105 |
765988 |
69854 |
5636 |
1.6 |
||
|
9 |
Abaloparatide Inj-3 |
2.112 |
766532 |
69824 |
5432 |
1.6 |
Std. Dev 567.7234 |
|
|
10 |
Abaloparatide Inj-4 |
2.113 |
766214 |
69875 |
5468 |
1.6 |
||
|
11 |
Abaloparatide Inj-5 |
2.109 |
765897 |
69854 |
5546 |
1.9 |
% RSD 0.074103 |
|
|
12 |
Abaloparatide Inj-6 |
2.109 |
765245 |
69848 |
5507 |
1.7 |
Table 7: Results of Intermediate precision on Day 1 and Day 2 for Teriparatide
|
S. No |
Day
|
Name |
Rt |
Area |
Height |
USP plate count |
USP Tailing |
USP Resolution |
|
|
1 |
Day-1 |
Teriparatide Inj-1 |
3.552 |
2659852 |
190025 |
5485 |
1.5 |
2.04 |
Mean 2655079 |
|
2 |
Teriparatide Inj-2 |
3.550 |
2648574 |
190048 |
5421 |
1.6 |
2.03 |
||
|
3 |
Teriparatide Inj-3 |
3.564 |
2659865 |
190054 |
5468 |
1.6 |
2.01 |
Std. Dev 5242.086 |
|
|
4 |
Teriparatide Inj-4 |
3.564 |
2658547 |
190078 |
5487 |
1.6 |
2.05 |
||
|
5 |
Teriparatide Inj-5 |
3.565 |
2648981 |
190016 |
5492 |
1.6 |
2.02 |
% RSD 0.197436 |
|
|
6 |
Teriparatide Inj-6 |
3.537 |
2654652 |
190057 |
5463 |
1.6 |
2.03 |
||
|
7 |
Day-2 |
Teriparatide Inj-1 |
3.537 |
2653254 |
190110 |
5428 |
1.6 |
7.98 |
Mean 2653678 |
|
8 |
Teriparatide Inj-2 |
3.552 |
2648985 |
190058 |
5452 |
1.6 |
6.4 |
||
|
9 |
Teriparatide Inj-3 |
3.560 |
2658213 |
190142 |
5498 |
1.6 |
8.9 |
Std. Dev 4313.355 |
|
|
10 |
Teriparatide Inj-4 |
3.564 |
2653652 |
190031 |
5442 |
1.5 |
8.3 |
||
|
11 |
Teriparatide Inj-5 |
3.564 |
2648978 |
190058 |
5489 |
1.5 |
7.5 |
% RSD 0.162543 |
|
|
12 |
Teriparatide Inj-6 |
3.565 |
2658985 |
190047 |
5463 |
1.6 |
5.3 |
Table 8: The accuracy results
|
%Concentration (at specification Level) |
Drug |
Area |
Amount Added (ppm) |
Amount Found (ppm) |
% Recovery |
Mean Recovery |
|
50% |
Abaloparatide |
392891.7 |
5 |
5.027 |
100.540% |
100.351% |
|
100% |
781996 |
10 |
10.026 |
100.260% |
||
|
150% |
1171988 |
15 |
15.038 |
100.253% |
||
|
50% |
Teriparatide |
204962 |
15 |
15.156 |
101.040% |
100.93% |
|
100% |
365018 |
30 |
30.378 |
101.260% |
||
|
150% |
521064.3 |
45 |
45.218 |
100.484% |
Table 9: Result for Robustness
|
Drug |
Parameter used for sample analysis |
Peak Area |
Retention Time |
Theoretical plates |
Tailing factor |
|
Abaloparatide |
Actual Flow rate of 1.0mL/min |
765789 |
2.102 |
5587 |
1.7 |
|
Less Flow rate of 0.9mL/min |
758698 |
2.330 |
5458 |
1.7 |
|
|
More Flow rate of 1.1mL/min |
7689584 |
1.950 |
5696 |
1.7 |
|
|
Less organic phase |
758412 |
2.290 |
5586 |
1.4 |
|
|
More organic phase |
769852 |
1.998 |
5355 |
1.5 |
|
|
Teriparatide |
Actual Flow rate of 1.0mL/min |
2532158 |
3.537 |
5398 |
1.6 |
|
Less Flow rate of 0.9mL/min |
2458692 |
3.885 |
5329 |
1.7 |
|
|
More Flow rate of 1.1mL/min |
2658642 |
3.263 |
5256 |
1.7 |
|
|
Less organic phase |
2452148 |
4.435 |
5214 |
1.2 |
|
|
More organic phase |
2653894 |
3.009 |
5524 |
1.0 |
Limit Of Detection:
Abaloparatide:0.6µg/ml
Teriparatide: 0.8µg/ml
Limit of Quantitation:
Abaloparatide: 1.8µg/ml
Teriparatide:2.4µg/ml
4. CONCLUSION:
The proposed method was found to be novel, simple, precise, accurate, rapid and specific for determination of Abaloparatide and Teriparatide in combined dosage form. Preparation of mobile phase was simple and economical. The method was validated for precision, accuracy and linearity. The RSD values for all the parameters were found to be less than 2, which indicates the method is fair agreement for obtained results. Hence this method can be easily and conveniently intended for the routine analysis of Abaloparatide and Teriparatide in combined dosage form.
5. REFERENCES:
1. C. Parthiban, Vislavath Anjali, Vollala Supriya, Dhontam Bhanu Priya, Sadineni Sri Nithya, M. Sudhakar. Analytical Method Development and Validation for Simultaneous Estimation of Memantine and Donepezil in Pharmaceutical Dosage form by RP-HPLC. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023; 13(4):243-6.
2. Samsuddin Ansari, Ankit Kumar, Manju Prajapati, Janki Prasad Rai. A Review on Pharmaceutical Process Validation. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2024; 14(3):251-6.
3. Mounika P Siridevi, Hemant T Kumar, Srinivasa Y Rao, Vara Prasad K Rao. RP-HPLC Method for Quantification of Empagliflozin in Pharmaceutical Formulation. Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 2019; 9(3):208-211.
4. Supriya Vanga, Aneesa, C. Parthiban, M. Sudhakar. Method Development and Validation for Simultaneous Estimation of Bempedoic Acid and Ezetimibe in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form by RP- HPLC. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2024; 14(4): 325-9.
5. Prabhu Venkatesh Moodbidri, Varadaraji Dhayanithi, Ganesh Belavadi Manjunathashastry, Hari Narayan Pati, Pardhasaradhi Vasireddy. A New Simultaneous Determination of Rosuvastatin Calcium and its Lactone Impurity by Reverse Phase HPLC method. Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2015; 5(4): 175-182.
6. Harshita H. Patel, Vishwas C. Bhagat, Rajkumar V. Shete, Amit S. Ravetkar. Analytical Method Development and Validation for biotin from Premixes (solid blend of Multi-Vitamin) by RP-HPLC. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2020; 13(3):1314-1318.
7. Sayali S. More, Sandeep S. Sonawane, Santosh S. Chhajed, Sanjay J. Kshirsagar. Development and Validation of RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Saxagliptin and Dapagliflozin in Tablets. Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 2018; 8 (3): 145-148.
8. Sravani Koralla, Sathish Kumar Konidala, K Govinda Rao, Sheik Mobina Begum. Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method For Simultaneous Estimation of Ramipril and Amlodipine Besylate in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form. Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2016; 6(4): 242-249.
9. Kavita wagh, Sandeep Sonawane, Santosh Chhaajed, Sanjay Kshirsagar. Development of RP-HPLC method for separation of atorvastatin calcium, amlodipine besylate and azilsartan medoxomil and its application to analyze their tablet dosage forms. Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2017; 7(3): 148-154.
10. Kasad Pinaz A, K.S. Muralikrishna. Base Degradation Study and Method Development of Rivaroxaban by RP-HPLC in bulk. Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2013; 3(3): 109-113.
11. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Abaloparatide
12. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abaloparatide
13. https://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB06285
14. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Teriparatide
15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teriparatide
|
Received on 02.03.2026 Revised on 09.04.2026 Accepted on 11.05.2026 Published on 27.05.2026 Available online from May 30, 2026 Asian J. Research Chem.2026; 19(3):177-181. DOI: 10.52711/0974-4150.2026.00029 ©A and V Publications All Right Reserved
|
|
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License. |
|